Proposal Management

more topics

A Technical Proposal is Not a Technical Document

It’s natural for technical professionals to treat proposals like reports—dense with detail, rigor, and precision. But a proposal isn’t just a technical document. It’s a persuasive tool.

Its purpose is to help the client say yes—with confidence.

That means going beyond specifications to demonstrate your understanding of the project’s goals, risks, stakeholders, and broader context. Strong proposals don’t just explain what you’ll build. They show how you’ll adapt to change, manage competing priorities, and lead the one variable no model can predict: people.

A Discipline All Its Own

Every proposal is a project—complete with a schedule, scope, deliverables, and deadlines. It deserves the same structure, clarity, and care.

Not all firms have dedicated proposal staff, but every team benefits from treating proposal management as a discipline in its own right. When roles are clear and coordination is strong, the process gains focus and momentum—especially in fast-moving, high-stakes pursuits.

Twennie fills a critical gap with tools and strategies built specifically for managing proposals in technical environments—where precision matters, and time is always tight.

The Non-Technical Professional in a Technical World

Proposal managers often come from non-technical backgrounds. They bring critical skills that technical teams rely on: coordination, communication, persuasive writing, and business insight.

Their success depends on influence, not authority. They’re expected to lead across disciplines, align stakeholders, and drive momentum—often without formal control.

Twennie supports these professionals with tools and guidance tailored to the realities of technical environments—helping them thrive in their roles, and helping technical teams recognize the value they bring.

suggested KPIs for this topic

These KPIs help you manage proposals like real projects — with clear roles, internal deadlines, planned reviews, and strong communication. They focus on preventing the most common delays and reducing last-minute chaos.

managing contributors & internal deadlines

  • Set internal deadlines for all contributors during the kickoff meeting — not after.
  • Build in schedule padding so final content is due at least 24–72 hours before production.
  • Send reminders as deadlines approach and track on-time delivery for each contributor.
  • Address late or missing content quickly, using clear, assertive follow-up messaging.
  • Review contributor performance after each major proposal and share lessons learned.

project data & references readiness

  • Identify all likely reference projects during the kickoff or strategy session.
  • Request missing project details immediately after the meeting using standard messaging.
  • Add new “data fields” to project profiles whenever an RFP asks for something you don’t track yet.
  • Secure client references for key projects in advance — not during a live proposal.
  • Maintain a central repository of project data that is easy for proposal teams to access.

decision gates, reviews & structured planning

  • Schedule Go/No-Go decisions at a specific time (e.g., “today at 2 pm”) and record the outcome.
  • Book all major reviews (e.g., color reviews) at the kickoff and lock them into calendars.
  • Use structured planning methods (e.g., win themes, Rapid Fire Methodology) rather than “winging it.”
  • Do not end planning sessions until required outputs (themes, storyboard, strategy notes) are captured.
  • Hold a quick “next steps” conversation at the end of every planning session.

writing approach & collaboration (storyboarding)

  • Storyboard the methodology or work plan before any formal writing begins.
  • Ensure every scope item appears on the storyboard with activities, deliverables, and responsibilities.
  • Use group storyboarding sessions to reduce isolated writing and rework later.
  • Confirm that all contributors leave the session with clear, agreed content to write.
  • Track whether storyboarded sections require fewer rounds of revision.

process, role clarity & infrastructure

  • Define a tiered proposal process (minimal, usual, full) and use the appropriate tier for each pursuit.
  • Assign a proposal manager or coordinator for every significant pursuit, with clear authority.
  • Follow the documented process steps consistently; if a step is skipped, ensure its outputs are still produced.
  • Use a standard folder structure and naming convention for every proposal.
  • Review and refine the process regularly based on time saved, quality, and team feedback.

communication & refinement quality

  • Use standard message templates for common stages (kickoff, assignment, reminders, reviews, final push).
  • Craft all messages to move the schedule forward with clear expectations and next steps.
  • Schedule color reviews and proofreading with enough time to implement edits properly.
  • Use a structured proofreading method (such as the Twennie Proofreading Method) for final checks.
  • Track how often late edits, missed errors, or unclear messages create avoidable stress near the deadline.